\n| \n By
\n City<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n RMB
\n (billion)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n % of
\n total<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n Hangzhou<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 19.14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8.3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Wenzhou<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 13.80<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6.0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Beijing<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 13.52<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5.9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Hefei<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 13.41<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5.8%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Chongqing<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 11.04<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.8%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Suzhou<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 10.57<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Changsha<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 9.76<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Tianjin<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 9.11<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Wuhan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 9.09<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Qingdao<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8.15<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Shanghai<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 7.4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Chengdu<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 7.39<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Jinan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 7.03<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Wuxi<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6.91<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Ningbo<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5.56<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Foshan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5.02<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Changzhou<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.62<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Nanjing<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.47<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Fuzhou<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.73<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Shenyang<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.61<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Dongguan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.56<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Jiaxing<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.26<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Taiyuan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.22<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Linyi<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.90<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Huizhou<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.73<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Yantai<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.63<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Yinchuan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.62<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Luoyang<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.59<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Shenzhen<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.55<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Jinhua<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.45<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Nanchang<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Taizhou<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.98<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Nanning<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.66<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.7%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Hong
\n Kong<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.59<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.7%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Jiangmen<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.46<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Zhengzhou<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.44<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Wuhu<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.24<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Zhoushan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.11<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Jining<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.09<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Others<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 15.45<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6.7%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n \n\n\n| \n By
\n Region<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n RMB
\n (billion)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n % of total<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n Yangtze
\n River Delta<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 101.19<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 43.8%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Pan
\n Bohai Rim<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 52.93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 22.9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Central
\n & Western Region<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 51.38<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 22.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Southern
\n China Region<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 25.50<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 11.1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n Land Acquisition<\/b><\/p>\n \n \n- In December 2020, the Group completed
\nthe following land acquisitions:\u00a0 <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n| \n City<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Project<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Group’s\u00a0 Equity Interest <\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Intended
\n Primary Use<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Site
\n Area<\/b><\/p>\n (sq.m.)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Total
\n Planned GFA (Excluding Carpark) (sq.m.)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Group’s
\n Attributable Consideration (RMB)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Average\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Land Cost
\n (Excluding Carpark)\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n (RMB\/<\/b><\/p>\n sq.m.)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n Changsha<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Yue
\n Lu District, Bin Jiang New City, Yu Bong Project<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 100%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Residential,
\n Commercial<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 94,400<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 424,800<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3,738,270,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8,800<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Huai’an<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Economic
\n Development Zone, An Lan Road East Project<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 100%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Residential,
\n Commercial<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 176,400<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 435,100<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 874,800,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2,011<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Chengdu<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Xin
\n Jin District, Xin Jin TOD Project <\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 66%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Residential,
\n Commercial<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 237,100<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 552,600<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 878,440,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2,408<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Guiyang<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n U
\n Dang District, Bei Ya Road Project<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 51%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Residential<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 147,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 558,300<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 896,390,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3,148<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Urumqi<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Shui
\n Mo Gou District, Convention Centre, 476 mu Project<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 51%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Residential,
\n Commercial<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 318,100<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 638,900<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,013,780,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3,111<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Wenzhou<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Ban
\n Dao Qi Bu District, Dong Tou County West,\u00a0
\n Zone B-09 Project<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 50%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Residential<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 147,500<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 427,900<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,125,000,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5,259<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Company
\nNews<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n- In
\nDecember, CIFI signed syndicated loan facility agreements with several banks
\nand financial institutions in Hong Kong, with an aggregate amount of US$362
\nmillion, comprising: (i) US$145 million 3.5-year certain term loan; and (ii)
\nHK$1,688 million (equivalent to approximately US$217 million) 3.5-year certain
\nterm loan. The syndicated loans were first led by China CITIC Bank
\nInternational and Bank of Communications Hong Kong Branch. Participating banks
\nalso include CMB Wing Lung Bank, Tai Fung Bank, The Bank of East Asia and Chong
\nHing Bank.<\/li>\n - In
\nDecember, the major shareholder, Lin’s family, increased the equity
\nstake in CIFI by two million shares. The average share price was HK$6.24 per
\nshare and the total consideration was HK$12.47 million. Up to now, the Lin’s
\nfamily together with the chairman of the board, Mr. Lin Zhong, increased the
\nequity stake in CIFI by 64.9 million shares in total during the year for a
\ntotal consideration of HK$413 million, demonstrating the major shareholder’s
\nfull confidence in CIFI’s long term development and potential appreciation of
\nits share price.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n ![](\"https:\/\/www.media-outreach.com\/release.php\/FeedTrack\/60817\")
\n
\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Full year contracted sales reached RMB231 billion, up approx. 15% YoY ; Achieved about 100.4% of full year sales target (RMB230 billion) HONG KONG SAR –\u00a0Media OutReach\u00a0–\u00a08 January 2021 –\u00a0 In December 2020, the Group achieved contracted sales of approx. RMB30.98 billion, representing a YoY increase of approx. 36% (compared to December 2019). Contracted …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10980,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[60],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10979"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10979"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10979\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eodishasamachar.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
| | | | | |